FRAMEWORK_TRAVEL_PLAN_-_PART_2-1335953.pdf


Establishes:

Walking, Cycling, and Horse-Riding Assessment: Provides an assessment of existing conditions and potential improvements for pedestrian, cycling, and horse-riding routes.

Meeting Notes with HCC Countryside Team: Discusses potential future development opportunities and improvements to Bridleway 32.

Weak Points:

Potential for Biased Assessments: The assessments and proposed improvements might be tailored to favour the development without fully addressing existing issues.

Implementation of Improvements: The responsibility for future improvements is often deferred, creating uncertainty about when and how these will be implemented.




Disclaimer


FLOOD_RISK_ASSESSMENT_V2-1335967.pdf


Key Points:

  • The site is within Flood Zone 1, indicating low flood risk.
  • Surface water runoff and drainage are critical considerations.
  • Recommendations for detailed drainage plans and site-specific infiltration tests.

Summary:

The flood risk assessment indicates low overall flood risk but emphasises the importance of managing surface water runoff through comprehensive drainage solutions.

Weak Points:

1. Scope of the Flood Risk Assessment

  • Insufficient Coverage: The current assessment may not fully address the broader hydrological impacts on lower-lying areas such as Beechlands Road and Red Hill, and Lymington Bottom.
  • Lack of Cumulative Impact Analysis: The study may not adequately consider the cumulative impact of both the existing and proposed developments on downstream locations.

2. Historical Context and Previous Developments

  • Lack of Full Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA): Previous developments in the rural area did not undergo a comprehensive EIA, leading to unaddressed flood risks and environmental impacts.
  • Omissions in Historical Data Review: The assessment may not thoroughly incorporate historical flood data and local knowledge, which are crucial for understanding the current flood risks.

3. Detailed Drainage Plans and Testing

  • Lack of Detailed Drainage Plans and Infiltration Tests: The absence of detailed drainage plans and infiltration tests at this stage could delay the project if required later.

4. Effectiveness of Drainage Solutions

  • Ensuring Effective Drainage Solutions: The effectiveness of the proposed drainage solutions in preventing any increase in flood risk to surrounding areas must be ensured.

5. Existing Flooding Issues

  • Exacerbation of Existing Flooding Issues: The development may exacerbate existing flooding issues at the Beechlands Road and Red Hill junction, potentially making the situation worse for residents.
  • Previous Mitigation Efforts: The Beechlands Road and Red Hill junction, which is lower than the already delivered estate and the proposed one, often floods. Previous road fixes by the developer have not resolved the issue.

What aspects should be evaluated in relation to this document?

Specific Considerations


Topographical Analysis:

  • Assess how the topography influences water flow from the development sites to lower-lying areas, particularly during heavy rainfall events.
  • Ensure that the flood risk assessment considers the cumulative impact of both the existing and proposed developments on the wider area, including downstream locations.

Hydraulic Modeling:

  • Use hydraulic modeling to simulate how water flows through the entire catchment area, taking into account the topography and existing drainage infrastructure.

Monitoring and Feedback:

  • Implement monitoring systems to track the effectiveness of mitigation measures and adjust them as necessary based on observed impacts.

Historical Flood Data:

  • Review historical flood data for Beechlands Road, Red Hill, and Lymington Bottom to identify patterns and potential triggers related to the development.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT


Sustainable Drainage Systems (SuDS):

  • Evaluate the design and effectiveness of SuDS proposed for managing surface water on the site. Ensure they provide adequate storage and infiltration for storm events, including allowances for climate change.
  • Assess the long-term maintenance plans for SuDS to ensure continued effectiveness in managing flood risks.

Flood Risk Assessment:

  • Review the methodology and conclusions of the flood risk assessment to ensure it adequately considers the site’s risk from tidal, fluvial, groundwater, and overland flow flooding.
  • Confirm that the development will not increase flood risk elsewhere, particularly in lower-lying areas such as the junction of Beechlands Road and Red Hill, and Lymington Bottom in Medstead.

Stakeholder Involvement:

  • Evaluate the extent of community engagement in the planning process. Ensure that local knowledge and concerns about flood risk have been addressed.
  • Assess the impact on lower-lying areas, such as the junction of Beechlands Road and Red Hill, and Lymington Bottom in Medstead, which may be affected by increased runoff from the development.

INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICES


Drainage Systems:

  • Assess the adequacy of the proposed surface water and foul drainage systems. Ensure they can handle peak flows and have appropriate maintenance plans.
  • Evaluate the potential cumulative impact of the drainage systems from both the existing and proposed developments on the wider area’s drainage network.

Water Quality:

  • Evaluate measures for protecting water quality, particularly regarding surface runoff and foul water discharge.

LOCAL AND NATIONAL PLANNING POLICIES


Compliance with NPPF:

  • Verify that the development complies with the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) guidelines for flood risk management.
  • Ensure the development meets criteria for flood resistance, resilience, and safe access/escape routes.

Local Planning Policies:

  • Review alignment with local policies from East Hampshire District Council and Partnership for Urban South Hampshire (PUSH).
  • Ensure adherence to site-specific flood risk policies and strategic flood risk assessments.

RESIDENTIAL AMENITY


Safety and Accessibility:

  • Assess the safety measures in place for future residents, particularly regarding flood risk and emergency access routes.
  • Evaluate the impact of flood risk management on the overall quality of life for residents.

DESIGN AND APPEARANCE


Integration with Surrounding Environment:

  • Ensure the development’s design integrates well with the surrounding environment and does not negatively impact the visual landscape.
  • Assess the aesthetic and functional design of flood management infrastructure within the site.


Disclaimer


DEVELOPMENT_PARCEL_PARAMETER_PLAN_01-1335983.pdf


Key Features:

  • Boundaries: The red outline indicates the site boundary.
  • Parcels: Different areas within the site boundary, indicating various uses.
  • Infrastructure: Roads, paths, and other infrastructure elements within the development area.

What aspects should be evaluated in relation to this document?

Environmental Impact


Green Space Preservation:

Evaluate how the development plans to preserve existing green spaces and natural habitats within the site boundary. Consider the impact on local biodiversity and ecosystem services.

Flood Risk Management:

Assess the strategies for managing flood risks, including the implementation of sustainable drainage systems (SuDS). Ensure that these strategies are adequate to handle stormwater and prevent flooding.

Residential Amenity


Quality of Life for Residents:

Review how the design and layout of the housing parcels affect the quality of life for residents. Consider factors such as noise levels, privacy, access to sunlight, and proximity to amenities and green spaces

Public Amenities and Recreational Areas:

Evaluate the provision of public amenities, such as parks, playgrounds, and community centres. Ensure that there is sufficient space for recreational activities and community interaction.

Community Involvement:

Review the extent of community involvement in the planning process. Ensure that community feedback has been considered and incorporated into the development plans.

Impact on Local Community:

Assess the impact of the development on the existing local community. Consider factors such as changes in population density, demand for local services, and social cohesion.

Land Use


Land Use Distribution:

Evaluate the distribution of land uses within the development site. Ensure that there is a balanced allocation of space for residential, commercial, public, and green areas.

Sustainability of Land Use:

Assess the sustainability of the proposed land uses. Consider the long-term viability of the development in terms of environmental, social, and economic factors.


Disclaimer


ECOLOGICAL_IMPACT_ASSESSMENT-1335968.pdf


Key Points:

Surveys conducted between 2018 and 2024, including habitat and species-specific surveys. Identified 25 Important Ecological Features (IEFs), including habitats and species of local and regional importance. Recommendations include habitat protection, creation of wildlife corridors, and mitigation measures for light and noise pollution.

Summary:

The ecological impact assessment highlights the need for careful planning to protect local wildlife. Recommendations focus on minimising disturbance to habitats and implementing strategies to enhance biodiversity.

Weak Points:

  • Some data, including tube tests, are from 2018, raising concerns about their current relevance and accuracy.
  • Potential biases in survey methods and interpretations to favour the developer’s outcomes.
  • Mitigation measures may be optimistic and require thorough verification.

What aspects should be evaluated in relation to this document?

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT


Biodiversity and Habitat Preservation:

  • Evaluate how the development affects local biodiversity, including flora and fauna. Assess measures for preserving and enhancing habitats within the site.

Ecological Connectivity:

  • Review the impact on ecological corridors and connectivity between habitats. Ensure that wildlife movement and genetic exchange are not disrupted by the development.

Protected Species and Sites:

  • Identify any protected species and designated conservation areas within or near the development site. Evaluate the measures proposed to mitigate impacts on these protected entities.

Mitigation Measures:

  • Assess the effectiveness of proposed habitat creation and restoration efforts. Ensure that these measures will compensate for any habitat loss or degradation caused by the development.
  • Review the long-term management plans for maintaining and monitoring ecological features. Ensure that there are clear strategies for managing habitats and species over the lifetime of the development.
  • Evaluate the commitment to achieving biodiversity net gain. Ensure that the development will result in a measurable improvement in biodiversity compared to the pre-development baseline.

Monitoring and Reporting:

  • Review the plans for monitoring the ecological impacts of the development over time. Ensure that there are clear indicators and methods for assessing the effectiveness of mitigation measures.
  • Ensure that there are provisions for regular reporting to relevant authorities and stakeholders on the ecological performance of the development.

DESIGN AND APPEARANCE


Integration of Green Infrastructure:

  • Assess how green infrastructure, such as green roofs, walls, and sustainable drainage systems (SuDS), is integrated into the design of the development. Ensure that these features contribute to ecological enhancement.

Landscape Design:

  • Review the landscape design for its contribution to ecological value. Ensure that native species are used, and that landscaping enhances habitat diversity and connectivity.

LOCAL AND NATIONAL PLANNING POLICIES


Local and National Planning Policies:

  • Verify that the ecological impact assessment aligns with relevant local and national planning policies, including those related to biodiversity conservation and environmental protection.

Legislation and Regulations:

  • Ensure compliance with relevant legislation and regulations, such as the Wildlife and Countryside Act and the Habitats Regulations. Review any required licenses and permits for working with protected species and habitats.

RESIDENTIAL AMENITY


Community Engagement:

  • Evaluate the extent of stakeholder and community involvement in the ecological assessment process. Ensure that local knowledge and concerns have been incorporated into the assessment and mitigation plans.
  • Assess opportunities for using the development to promote environmental education and recreation. Ensure that the design includes features that can engage and benefit the local community, such as nature trails and information boards.

Disclaimer


DESIGN_AND_ACCESS_STATEMENT-1335969.pdf


Establishes:

Describes the proposed development, including design principles, access, and landscaping.
Provides a framework for sustainable high-quality development.
Incorporates pedestrian and vehicular access, emphasizing connectivity and sustainability.

Weak Points:

The proposed development includes two-storey houses, which may not align with the existing bungalow-style houses on Beechlands Road, potentially impacting local character.
Claims of sustainability and design quality may not fully address practical issues such as drainage and traffic impact.

x

What aspects should be evaluated in relation to this document?

x


x

x


x

x


x


Disclaimer