ARBORICULTURAL_IMPACT_APPRAISAL_AND_METHOD_SATEMENT-1335971 — SGN-7-Excavation-in-RPAs-V3.pdf

Excavation in Root Protection Areas (RPAs) (SGN 7)


Establishes:

  • Guidelines for conducting excavation within RPAs to minimize damage to tree roots.
  • Recommends the use of hand tools or compressed air soil displacement to avoid mechanical excavation.
  • Specifies that roots over 2.5 cm in diameter should only be cut with the approval of the supervising arboriculturist.
  • Protects exposed roots from drying out and temperature extremes using dampened hessian or similar coverings.

Weak Points:

  • The success of these measures heavily relies on strict adherence to guidelines and supervision.
  • Unauthorised or improper excavation practices could lead to significant damage to tree roots and compromise tree health.


What aspects should be evaluated in relation to this document?

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT


Review Excavation Practices:

Ensure the document outlines safe excavation practices within RPAs to minimize root damage and soil disruption.

DESIGN AND APPEARANCE


Assess Excavation Impact on Design:

Evaluate how the proposed excavation methods will integrate with the overall design, ensuring minimal visual and structural impact.

RESIDENTIAL AMENITY


Consider Construction Impact:

Review how excavation activities will affect residents, focusing on noise, dust, and accessibility. Measures should be taken to minimize disruption.


Disclaimer


ARBORICULTURAL_IMPACT_APPRAISAL_AND_METHOD_SATEMENT-1335971 — SGN-8-Removing-Surfaces-V3.pdf

Removing Surfacing and Structures in RPAs (SGN 8)


Establishes:

  • Procedures for safely removing surfacing and structures within RPAs without causing damage to roots.
  • Emphasises the importance of manual removal using appropriate tools and the use of machinery only from outside the RPAs.
  • Highlights the potential need to leave below-ground structures in place to avoid excessive disturbance.

Weak Points:

  • Risks associated with unauthorized removal or improper handling, leading to potential root damage.
  • Effective monitoring and compliance are critical to ensure the protection of roots during these activities.


What aspects should be evaluated in relation to this document?

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT


Evaluate Surface Removal Techniques:

Ensure the document includes methods for safely removing surfaces within RPAs to avoid damaging roots and soil.

DESIGN AND APPEARANCE


Assess Visual Impact:

Check how surface removal activities will affect the site’s appearance, ensuring they do not leave unsightly marks or disrupt the visual flow.

RESIDENTIAL AMENITY


Review Impact on Accessibility:

Evaluate how surface removal will impact residents’ access to different parts of the site, ensuring pathways and recreational areas remain usable.


Disclaimer


APPENDIX_4_-_SUSTAINABILITY_CHECKLIST-1335970.pdf


Establishes:

Energy Efficiency: The checklist outlines proposed measures for achieving energy efficiency in the development, such as aiming for a minimum of 31% carbon reduction and integrating renewable energy technologies like air source heat pumps and photovoltaic panels.

Biodiversity: Commitment to achieving a minimum of 10% biodiversity net gain, with plans to incorporate water butts, sustainable drainage systems (SuDS), and maintain green infrastructure.

Construction Practices: Plans to consider sustainable sourcing of materials, waste management, and the potential reuse of building materials.

Weak Points:

Deferred Details: Many critical details, including specific energy efficiency measures and SuDS, are deferred to the Reserved Matters (RM) stage, which means there’s no immediate commitment to these measures.

Lack of Specific Commitments: While the document outlines intentions, it lacks specific, immediate commitments, creating uncertainty about the actual implementation and effectiveness of the proposed measures.

Potential Implementation Gaps: The success of the sustainability measures depends on detailed plans and execution at the RM stage, which might differ from the initial proposals.

What aspects should be evaluated in relation to this document?

Sustainability


Check if the checklist addresses the need for sustainable building practices and energy efficiency. Assess how these practices contribute to reducing the environmental impact of the development.

Environmental Impact


Evaluate the implementation of measures like Sustainable Drainage Systems (SuDS) and biodiversity net gain. Determine if these measures effectively support ecological balance and mitigate the environmental impact.

Infrastructure and Services


Examine how water efficiency and renewable energy technologies are integrated into the development. Consider their effectiveness in reducing demand on local infrastructure and promoting sustainable resource use.


Disclaimer


ARBORICULTURAL_IMPACT_APPRAISAL_AND_METHOD_SATEMENT-1335971 — SGN-12-Landscaping-V3.pdf

Landscaping in Root Protection Areas (SGN 12)


Establishes:

  • Guidelines for conducting landscaping activities within RPAs without causing harm to trees.
  • Emphasis on minimising soil disturbance and protecting root systems.

Weak Points:

  • Landscaping activities have a high potential for causing unintended damage if not carefully managed.
  • Ensuring all landscaping works are supervised and comply with arboricultural guidelines.

What aspects should be evaluated in relation to this document?

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT


Review Landscaping Practices:

Ensure the document includes guidelines for landscaping within RPAs that support biodiversity and environmental sustainability. The use of native plants and sustainable practices should be prioritised.

DESIGN AND APPEARANCE


Assess Aesthetic Integration:

Evaluate how the proposed landscaping will enhance the visual appeal of the development. Landscaping should complement the design and provide aesthetic value.

RESIDENTIAL AMENITY


Consider Community Benefits:

Assess how the landscaping plans will benefit residents, providing green spaces for recreation and improving the overall quality of life. Ensure that the landscaping is designed to be accessible and usable for all community members.


Disclaimer


ARBORICULTURAL_IMPACT_APPRAISAL_AND_METHOD_SATEMENT-1335971 — SGN-11-Services-V3.pdf

Installing Services in Root Protection Areas (RPAs) (SGN 11)


Establishes:

  • Guidelines for installing or upgrading services (e.g., utilities) within RPAs to avoid damage to tree roots.
  • Recommends trenchless installation methods (e.g., thrust boring) to prevent soil and root disturbance.
  • Advises hand-dug trenches as a fallback when trenchless methods are not feasible, with precautions to avoid significant root damage.
  • Provides methods to protect exposed roots during installation, such as using hessian for temporary protection.

Weak Points:

  • Ensuring proper installation techniques to prevent root damage is critical.
  • The effectiveness of trenchless and hand-dug methods relies on careful execution and supervision by an arboriculturist.
  • Backfilled material around excavated services must be managed to maintain permeability and avoid compaction.

What aspects should be evaluated in relation to this document?

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT


Evaluate Service Installation Methods:

Ensure the document outlines safe methods for installing services (e.g., utilities) within RPAs, focusing on minimizing root damage and soil disruption. Trenchless installation methods should be prioritised.

DESIGN AND APPEARANCE


Assess Integration with Design:

Check how the installation of services will integrate with the overall site design, ensuring that service routes are planned to minimize visual impact and disruption.

RESIDENTIAL AMENITY


Consider Impact on Residents:

Evaluate how the installation of services will affect residents, especially in terms of access and safety during the construction phase. Measures should be taken to minimize disruption and maintain the usability of the site.


Disclaimer


ARBORICULTURAL_IMPACT_APPRAISAL_AND_METHOD_SATEMENT-1335971 — SGN-10-Structures-V3.pdf

Installing Structures in Root Protection Areas (RPAs) (SGN 10)



Establishes:

  • Guidelines for installing new structures in RPAs while minimising root damage and soil disturbance.
  • Recommends using pile, pad, or post supports for substantial structures to minimize soil excavation.
  • Advises keeping existing below-ground structures to support new ones, reducing the need for new excavations.
  • Provides methods to ensure water and air input under substantial structures.


Weak Points:

  • Ensuring proper hand-digging techniques to avoid significant roots is essential.
  • The risk of compaction and chemical contamination must be managed carefully during installation.
  • The effectiveness of these methods depends on careful planning and adherence to guidelines to prevent root damage and soil compaction.

What aspects should be evaluated in relation to this document?

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT


Evaluate Structure Installation Methods:

Ensure the document includes methods for safely installing structures in RPAs, minimizing root damage and soil disturbance.

DESIGN AND APPEARANCE


Assess Compatibility with Design:

Check how the new structures will integrate with the overall site design, ensuring they enhance the aesthetic and functional aspects.

RESIDENTIAL AMENITY


Consider Impact on Residents:

Evaluate how the installation of new structures will affect residents, focusing on privacy, views, and access to green spaces.


Disclaimer


ARBORICULTURAL_IMPACT_APPRAISAL_AND_METHOD_SATEMENT-1335971.pdf

Document: ARBORICULTURAL_IMPACT_APPRAISAL_AND_METHOD_STATEMENT-1335971.pdf (Including multiple SGNs)


Establishes:

  • The necessity of protecting trees during construction to comply with environmental standards and regulations.
  • The potential impacts on trees and mitigation strategies to ensure minimal damage to the existing landscape.

Weak Points:

  • The effectiveness of mitigation measures might be questioned, especially if past attempts have shown inadequate results.
  • Implementation and adherence to these measures need thorough monitoring to ensure compliance.


What aspects should be evaluated in relation to this document?

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT


Evaluate Arboricultural Management Practices:

Ensure the document outlines comprehensive arboricultural management practices that protect tree health and soil stability during development. Practices should minimise environmental disruption and support biodiversity.

DESIGN AND APPEARANCE


Assess Compatibility with Site Design:

Check how the arboricultural management practices will integrate with the overall site design, ensuring that trees and green spaces are preserved and incorporated harmoniously into the development.

RESIDENTIAL AMENITY


Consider Impact on Community:

Evaluate how the arboricultural practices will affect residents, ensuring that they enhance the liveability of the development by providing green spaces and maintaining a healthy environment.


Disclaimer


APPLICATION_FORM_REDACTED-1335944.pdf


Establishes:

Basic Application Information: Provides essential details about the application, including the site location, description of the proposed development (up to 70 dwellings with vehicular and pedestrian accesses, public open space, landscaping, and drainage), and the developer’s details.

Document References: Confirms the submission of various supporting documents, such as the Design and Access Statement, Services Plan, and Flood Risk Assessment.

Residential Units: Specifies the types and numbers of proposed residential units, including market and affordable housing.

Weak Points:

General Information: The application form itself does not provide detailed justifications or assessments but references other documents for comprehensive details.

Potential Gaps in Application Package: If referenced documents do not fully address key concerns, there may be gaps in the application package.

Lack of Immediate Detail: The form defers many specifics to the supporting documents, requiring thorough review of all referenced materials to get a complete understanding of the proposal (over 1k pages).

Material Consideration Explanation:

Local and National Planning Policies: The application form confirms compliance with planning policies, which is crucial for obtaining approval.

Infrastructure and Services: The details about vehicular and pedestrian accesses, public open space, and drainage impact local infrastructure and services, ensuring the development meets community needs.

Residential Amenity: Information about residential units impacts the assessment of the development’s fit within the community, considering factors like housing type, density, and mix.


What aspects should be evaluated in relation to this document?

Local and National Planning Policies


Review the application form to confirm that the development adheres to local and national planning policies. This is crucial for obtaining approval and ensuring the project aligns with broader planning objectives.

Infrastructure and Services


Assess Access and Connectivity: Examine the details about vehicular and pedestrian access to ensure they are sufficient and well-integrated into the existing infrastructure. Consider whether the proposed access points meet safety standards and provide convenient routes for future residents.

Evaluate Public Open Space Provision: Check the plans for public open spaces to ensure they meet community needs and contribute to the quality of life. This includes assessing the size, location, and intended use of these spaces.

Analyse Drainage Plans: Review the drainage plans to understand their impact on local infrastructure. Ensure that the development will not exacerbate existing drainage issues and that it includes sustainable drainage solutions.

Residential Amenity


Evaluate Housing Type and Density: Consider the types of residential units proposed, their density, and how they fit within the existing community. Assess whether the mix of housing types meets local demand and contributes to a balanced community.

Assess Impact on Community Fit: Examine how the proposed residential units integrate with the surrounding area in terms of architectural style, scale, and overall design. Ensure that the development enhances the character of the community and does not create incongruities.


Disclaimer


ACCESS_AND_MOVEMENT_PARAMETER_PLAN-1335984.pdf


It is a detailed map outlining various access and movement networks for the proposed development.

The key elements shown in the plan include:

  • Site Boundary: The outer limits of the development area.
  • Vehicular Access: Points where vehicles can enter and exit the development.
  • Pedestrian Access: Entry points and pathways specifically for pedestrians.
  • Cycle Access: Designated entry points and routes for cyclists.
  • Primary Street: The main roads within the development.
  • Secondary Street: Smaller roads branching from the primary streets.
  • Shared Surface Street: Streets designed to be shared by vehicles, pedestrians, and cyclists.
  • Private Drive: Access routes meant for individual properties.
  • Pedestrian Link: Paths connecting different parts of the development for pedestrian use.
  • Cycle Link: Paths designated for cyclist use to connect various areas.


What aspects should be evaluated in relation to this document?

Traffic and Access


Check if the vehicular, pedestrian, and cycle access points are sufficient to handle the expected traffic and ensure safe ingress and egress.

Analyse how the proposed street network (primary, secondary, shared surface, private drives) will impact traffic flow within and around the development. Consider whether the plan will minimise congestion and improve connectivity.

Examine the design of shared surface streets to ensure they enhance safety for all users by reducing vehicle speeds and providing clear pathways for pedestrians and cyclists.

Evaluate the broader effects of increased traffic on existing local roads and neighbourhoods. Address potential congestion and safety issues that may arise.

Assess how the development’s pedestrian and cycle links integrate with existing networks to improve connectivity for the local community.

Sustainability


Consider if the document includes plans for pedestrian and cycle links, encouraging walking and cycling to reduce reliance on cars and lower carbon emissions.

Determine how well the development’s access points and internal network connect with existing public transport services, promoting the use of sustainable transport options.

Infrastructure and Services


Check whether local infrastructure (roads, paths, public transport) can accommodate the additional load generated by the development.

Ensure the proposed internal network provides necessary infrastructure to support the development, including roads, pedestrian pathways, and cycle routes.

Residential Amenity


Evaluate how the design of streets and access points will affect the quality of life for residents, considering factors such as noise, safety, and convenience.

Check the ease with which residents can access amenities, services, and public transport, enhancing overall livability.

Environmental Impact


Review how the construction and use of access routes may affect local green spaces, wildlife habitats, and overall environmental quality.

Assess plans for minimizing environmental disruption and ensuring sustainable development practices.


Disclaimer