The national and local policies are overly convoluted, with inadequate or ineffective quality assurance and control over their functionality. This is due to ambiguous regulations, inconsistent guidelines, and a lack of resources or inadequate training.
The main objective of planning authorities is to regulate and manage land use and development within their jurisdiction in a manner that promotes sustainable development, protects the environment, ensures public safety, and enhances the quality of life for residents.
More convoluted policies result in greater constraints on adequate supervision. This creates an environment conducive to organised abuse and workarounds, which raises questions about the purpose of these policies. This is especially concerning given that the housing shortage UK crisis persists.
Just as organizations conduct root cause analysis to identify the primary contributors to defects, Planning authorities can and should conduct thorough assessments of national and local policies to pinpoint specific areas where improvements are most needed. This analysis can help streamline processes, eliminate redundancies, and enhance clarity and consistency in regulations.
By gradually expanding development in smaller increments over time, businesses or developers may seek to evade regulatory thresholds that would necessitate more extensive assessments or approvals, such as EIAs.
The purpose of a screening opinion is NOT to tailor information and argue AGAINST the need for an EIA.
Such abusive conduct is contrary to the principles of sustainable development. It raises serious concerns about environmental impacts and demands public opposition.
It is an initial assessment phase that helps regulatory authorities decide if the potential environmental impacts of a project are significant enough to warrant a comprehensive EIA.
The UK faces a heightened risk of monopolistic practices in its housing market. When housing is scarce, demand often outstrips supply, leading to intensified competition among buyers and renters. In such scenarios, developers and landlords may wield greater influence over terms and prices, potentially stifling market competition….WE CALL FOR A NATIONAL AUDIT of the new housing market!