If the population increase from 6,019 to 8,300 over 10 years in a village (Four Marks & Medstead ward) was due to development and there was no Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) conducted, it must raise concerns

[Go 2 References1]


Local authorities are generally legally responsible for ensuring that all new developments are built in line with sustainable development rules.


If no EIA was conducted in the context of such a vast population increase, it suggests that the system of local and national regulations is dysfunctional, as it enables a ‘creeping strategy’ to flourish.

By gradually expanding development in smaller increments over time, businesses or developers may seek to evade regulatory thresholds that would necessitate more extensive assessments or approvals, such as EIAs. This incremental approach allows them to operate discreetly or minimize scrutiny while still accomplishing their long-term objectives.

Circumventing regulatory constraints or oversight, such as avoiding the need for an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA), can be illegal if done intentionally to bypass legal requirements and environmental protection measures.

The cumulative significance of the developments’ impact did not trigger EIA scrutiny, as proposals were presented in piecemeal formats, effectively ‘trojan horsed.’

This reflects the dysfunctionality of the system of local and national planning regulations. The effects of such a turn of events, namely the lack of an EIA, are as follows:

  • The potential environmental impacts of the development might not have been properly identified or mitigated. This includes impacts on local ecosystems, water resources, air quality, and biodiversity. #unidentified-impacts

  • There could be increased pollution (air, water, noise) that has not been addressed or controlled adequately. #uncontrolled-pollution
  • The infrastructure may not have been upgraded to handle the increased population, leading to overburdened roads, water supply systems, sewage treatment, and public transport. #unplanned-growth

  • Public services like healthcare, education, and emergency services may be strained, affecting their quality and availability. #service-dverload

  • The rapid increase in population could have altered the social fabric and culture of the village, potentially causing friction or loss of community identity. #cultural-impact

  • Existing residents may have experienced displacement or significant disruption without adequate measures to mitigate these effects. #displacement #disruption

  • An EIA would have identified measures to mitigate negative impacts, which are now potentially unaddressed. #missed-opportunitieso-for-mitigation

  • Without an EIA, the long-term sustainability of the development is questionable. Environmental degradation and resource depletion could have lasting negative effects on the village. #long-term-effects

  • The village may be less resilient to future challenges such as climate change, resource scarcity, and further population growth. #resilience

If local authorities fail to ensure compliance with sustainable development rules, a combination of legal, administrative, political, and community actions can be taken to address the issue. It is essential to document evidence, engage with authorities, leverage media and public pressure, and seek professional and NGO support. These steps can help ensure that sustainable development principles are upheld and that the environmental, social, and economic impacts of developments are appropriately managed.


As per the above, it is crucial to urgently:

Conduct a post-development environmental and social assessment to identify and address any unmitigated impacts.
Implement corrective measures and mitigation strategies as needed.

Ensure future developments are subject to rigorous EIA processes to prevent similar situations.
Review and enforce existing environmental regulations and planning laws.

EIA: What Is It?

The primary goal of an EIA is to identify and assess the likely environmental impacts of a proposed project and to inform the public and all other stakeholders about these effects.

It allows decision-makers to validate whether the proposed project would contribute positively to the community.

Little did I know that a creeping strategy could be employed to circumvent regulatory constraints or oversight, such as avoiding the need for an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA)

By gradually expanding development in smaller increments over time, businesses or developers may seek to evade regulatory thresholds that would necessitate more extensive assessments or approvals, such as EIAs.

Never underestimate the significance of the negative environmental impact of ‘piecemeal’ developments collectively creeping into villages

While individual housing developments may have relatively small environmental impacts on their own, their collective impact when combined with other developments in the area is often significant. An EIA should assess the cumulative effects of multiple developments to understand their overall impact on the environment.

#cumulative-effects #infrastructure-and-services #environmental-resources #social-and-economic-impacts

The Concept of Sustainable Development: Why Are EIAs So Important?

Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) plays a crucial role in sustainable development by helping to ensure that proposed projects and developments are evaluated in terms of their potential environmental, social, and economic impacts before they are approved and implemented.

The Brundtland Report defined sustainable development as “development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.”

References:


  1. FOI – REF-191888-D3L9 – POPULATION
    FOI – REF-191888-D3L9 – EHDC SPREADSHEET “DWELLINGS COMPLETIONS IN FOUR MARKS AND MEDSTEAD BETWEEN 2011 AND 2023 (APR-MAR) BY PARISH”
    EIA SCREENING APPLICATION FOR FOUR MARKS & MEDSTEAD WARD (2011-2024) ↩︎

To EIA or not to EIA, that is the screening application question

Screening Opinion in EIA – Purpose

The purpose of a screening opinion in the context of an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) is to determine whether a proposed project requires a full EIA.

The purpose of a screening opinion is NOT to tailor information and argue AGAINST the need for an EIA. Such abusive conduct is contrary to the principles of sustainable development. It raises serious concerns about environmental impacts and demands public opposition.

It is an initial assessment phase that helps regulatory authorities decide if the potential environmental impacts of a project are significant enough to warrant a comprehensive EIA.

The screening opinion is a crucial step in the EIA process that helps ensure that significant environmental impacts are identified and addressed early in the project planning stages, thereby promoting sustainable development and environmental protection.

Screening Opinion in EIA – Key Objectives

The primary objective is to decide if a full EIA is necessary for the proposed project. This decision is based on criteria such as the size, nature, and potential environmental impact of the project.

To identify any potential significant environmental effects that the project might have. This includes considering the type of development, the location, and the potential scale of impacts.

To categorise the project under relevant regulatory frameworks. In many jurisdictions, projects are classified into categories or lists that indicate whether an EIA is mandatory, optional, or not required.

To provide early guidance to the project developers about what environmental considerations need to be addressed. This can include preliminary suggestions for mitigating potential impacts.

To facilitate efficient decision-making by regulatory authorities and project developers. A screening opinion helps streamline the process by identifying whether further detailed analysis is needed.

Screening Opinion in EIA – Process

The project developer submits detailed information about the proposed project, including its location, scale, and potential environmental impacts.

The regulatory authority reviews the submitted information against established criteria and thresholds to assess the potential significance of the environmental impacts.

In some cases, the regulatory authority may consult with other stakeholders, including environmental agencies, local authorities, and the public, to gather additional input on the potential impacts.

The regulatory authority issues a screening opinion, which states whether a full EIA is required. If an EIA is deemed necessary, the opinion will outline the key issues that need to be addressed in the assessment.

Screening Opinion in EIA – Benefits

By determining early on whether a full EIA is needed, the screening opinion helps avoid unnecessary delays and ensures that resources are allocated appropriately.

Provides clarity to project developers and stakeholders about the regulatory requirements and the scope of environmental assessments needed.

Ensures that projects with potentially significant environmental impacts are subjected to thorough analysis and mitigation measures.


EIA: What Is It?

The primary goal of an EIA is to identify and assess the likely environmental impacts of a proposed project and to inform the public and all other stakeholders about these effects.

It allows decision-makers to validate whether the proposed project would contribute positively to the community.

Little did I know that a creeping strategy could be employed to circumvent regulatory constraints or oversight, such as avoiding the need for an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA)

By gradually expanding development in smaller increments over time, businesses or developers may seek to evade regulatory thresholds that would necessitate more extensive assessments or approvals, such as EIAs.

The Concept of Sustainable Development: Why Are EIAs So Important?

Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) plays a crucial role in sustainable development by helping to ensure that proposed projects and developments are evaluated in terms of their potential environmental, social, and economic impacts before they are approved and implemented.

The Brundtland Report defined sustainable development as “development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.”

The overly convoluted national and local policies create an environment conducive to organised abuse and workarounds

Just as organizations conduct root cause analysis to identify the primary contributors to defects, Planning authorities can and should conduct thorough assessments of national and local policies to pinpoint specific areas where improvements are most needed. This analysis can help streamline processes, eliminate redundancies, and enhance clarity and consistency in regulations.

Urbanising villages does not address the underlying factors driving housing shortages

Developing new settlements with comprehensive planning and infrastructure provision offers a more sustainable solution by creating well-designed, inclusive communities that meet the needs of residents while minimizing strain on existing infrastructure.


Never underestimate the significance of the negative environmental impact of ‘piecemeal’ developments collectively creeping into villages

The collective impact of individual new housing developments in the area should be subjected to Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) evaluations.


While individual housing developments may have relatively small environmental impacts on their own, their collective impact when combined with other developments in the area is often significant. An EIA should assess the cumulative effects of multiple developments to understand their overall impact on the environment. #cumulative-effects

The cumulative effect of multiple housing developments can strain local infrastructure and services, such as transportation networks, utilities, schools, and healthcare facilities. An EIA should evaluate the capacity of existing infrastructure to accommodate the increased demand generated by new developments and identify any necessary upgrades or improvements. #infrastructure-and-services

Collectively, new housing developments can impact natural resources such as water bodies, wildlife habitats, and green spaces. An EIA should assess the cumulative effects of development on these resources and identify measures to protect or mitigate adverse impacts. #environmental-resources

The collective impact of housing developments can also have social and economic implications for the local community, including changes in population demographics, housing affordability, and community cohesion. An EIA should consider these factors and assess their cumulative effects on the well-being of residents. #social-and-economic-impacts

By considering the collective impact of individual housing developments, EIAs can provide a more comprehensive understanding of the overall environmental, social, and economic implications of development in a given area. This allows decision-makers to make informed choices about land use planning and development that balance growth with environmental and community needs.


EIA: What Is It?

The primary goal of an EIA is to identify and assess the likely environmental impacts of a proposed project and to inform the public and all other stakeholders about these effects.

It allows decision-makers to validate whether the proposed project would contribute positively to the community.

Little did I know that a creeping strategy could be employed to circumvent regulatory constraints or oversight, such as avoiding the need for an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA)

By gradually expanding development in smaller increments over time, businesses or developers may seek to evade regulatory thresholds that would necessitate more extensive assessments or approvals, such as EIAs.


Little did I know that a creeping strategy could be employed to circumvent regulatory constraints or oversight, such as avoiding the need for an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA)


A creeping strategy involves a methodical and incremental approach to achieving long-term objectives without attracting significant opposition or attention.


This strategy can be employed to circumvent regulatory constraints or oversight, such as avoiding the need for an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) in the context of village urbanisation.

By gradually expanding development in smaller increments over time, businesses or developers may seek to evade regulatory thresholds that would necessitate more extensive assessments or approvals, such as EIAs.

This incremental approach allows them to operate discreetly and minimize scrutiny while still accomplishing their long-term objectives, without controlled accountability for the impacts and effects of their actions.


The use of dormant companies and entering partnerships could potentially be part of this strategy to conceal such practices.


EIA: What Is It?

The primary goal of an EIA is to identify and assess the likely environmental impacts of a proposed project and to inform the public and all other stakeholders about these effects.

It allows decision-makers to validate whether the proposed project would contribute positively to the community.

Never underestimate the significance of the negative environmental impact of ‘piecemeal’ developments collectively creeping into villages

While individual housing developments may have relatively small environmental impacts on their own, their collective impact when combined with other developments in the area is often significant. An EIA should assess the cumulative effects of multiple developments to understand their overall impact on the environment.

#cumulative-effects #infrastructure-and-services #environmental-resources #social-and-economic-impacts

The Concept of Sustainable Development: Why Are EIAs So Important?

Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) plays a crucial role in sustainable development by helping to ensure that proposed projects and developments are evaluated in terms of their potential environmental, social, and economic impacts before they are approved and implemented.

The Brundtland Report defined sustainable development as “development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.”

The overly convoluted national and local policies create an environment conducive to organised abuse and workarounds

Just as organizations conduct root cause analysis to identify the primary contributors to defects, Planning authorities can and should conduct thorough assessments of national and local policies to pinpoint specific areas where improvements are most needed. This analysis can help streamline processes, eliminate redundancies, and enhance clarity and consistency in regulations.

To EIA or not to EIA, that is the screening application question

The purpose of a screening opinion is NOT to tailor information and argue AGAINST the need for an EIA.

Such abusive conduct is contrary to the principles of sustainable development. It raises serious concerns about environmental impacts and demands public opposition.

It is an initial assessment phase that helps regulatory authorities decide if the potential environmental impacts of a project are significant enough to warrant a comprehensive EIA.

Why are monopolistic practices prevalent in the UK housing market?

The UK faces a heightened risk of monopolistic practices in its housing market. When housing is scarce, demand often outstrips supply, leading to intensified competition among buyers and renters. In such scenarios, developers and landlords may wield greater influence over terms and prices, potentially stifling market competition….WE CALL FOR A NATIONAL AUDIT of the new housing market!