Tag: link-0041

The overly convoluted national and local policies create an environment conducive to organised abuse and workarounds

To EIA or not to EIA, that is the screening application question

Screening Opinion in EIA – Purpose

The purpose of a screening opinion in the context of an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) is to determine whether a proposed project requires a full EIA.

The purpose of a screening opinion is NOT to tailor information and argue AGAINST the need for an EIA. Such abusive conduct is contrary to the principles of sustainable development. It raises serious concerns about environmental impacts and demands public opposition.

It is an initial assessment phase that helps regulatory authorities decide if the potential environmental impacts of a project are significant enough to warrant a comprehensive EIA.

The screening opinion is a crucial step in the EIA process that helps ensure that significant environmental impacts are identified and addressed early in the project planning stages, thereby promoting sustainable development and environmental protection.

Screening Opinion in EIA – Key Objectives

1. Determine the Need for EIA

The primary objective is to decide if a full EIA is necessary for the proposed project. This decision is based on criteria such as the size, nature, and potential environmental impact of the project.

2. Identify Potential Impacts

To identify any potential significant environmental effects that the project might have. This includes considering the type of development, the location, and the potential scale of impacts.

3. Categorise the Project

To categorise the project under relevant regulatory frameworks. In many jurisdictions, projects are classified into categories or lists that indicate whether an EIA is mandatory, optional, or not required.

4. Provide Early Guidance

To provide early guidance to the project developers about what environmental considerations need to be addressed. This can include preliminary suggestions for mitigating potential impacts.

5. Facilitate Decision-Making

To facilitate efficient decision-making by regulatory authorities and project developers. A screening opinion helps streamline the process by identifying whether further detailed analysis is needed.

Screening Opinion in EIA – Process

1. Submission of Project Details

The project developer submits detailed information about the proposed project, including its location, scale, and potential environmental impacts.

2. Review by Regulatory Authority

The regulatory authority reviews the submitted information against established criteria and thresholds to assess the potential significance of the environmental impacts.

3. Consultation

In some cases, the regulatory authority may consult with other stakeholders, including environmental agencies, local authorities, and the public, to gather additional input on the potential impacts.

4. Issuance of Screening Opinion

The regulatory authority issues a screening opinion, which states whether a full EIA is required. If an EIA is deemed necessary, the opinion will outline the key issues that need to be addressed in the assessment.

Screening Opinion in EIA – Benefits

Efficiency

By determining early on whether a full EIA is needed, the screening opinion helps avoid unnecessary delays and ensures that resources are allocated appropriately.

Clarity

Provides clarity to project developers and stakeholders about the regulatory requirements and the scope of environmental assessments needed.

Environmental Protection

Ensures that projects with potentially significant environmental impacts are subjected to thorough analysis and mitigation measures.

EIA: What Is It?

The primary goal of an EIA is to identify and assess the likely environmental impacts of a proposed project and to inform the public and all other stakeholders about these effects.

It allows decision-makers to validate whether the proposed project would contribute positively to the community.

Little did I know that a creeping strategy could be employed to circumvent regulatory constraints or oversight, such as avoiding the need for an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA)

By gradually expanding development in smaller increments over time, businesses or developers may seek to evade regulatory thresholds that would necessitate more extensive assessments or approvals, such as EIAs.

The Concept of Sustainable Development: Why Are EIAs So Important?

Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) plays a crucial role in sustainable development by helping to ensure that proposed projects and developments are evaluated in terms of their potential environmental, social, and economic impacts before they are approved and implemented.

The Brundtland Report defined sustainable development as “development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.”

The overly convoluted national and local policies create an environment conducive to organised abuse and workarounds

Just as organizations conduct root cause analysis to identify the primary contributors to defects, Planning authorities can and should conduct thorough assessments of national and local policies to pinpoint specific areas where improvements are most needed. This analysis can help streamline processes, eliminate redundancies, and enhance clarity and consistency in regulations.

Urbanising villages does not address the underlying factors driving housing shortages

Developing new settlements with comprehensive planning and infrastructure provision offers a more sustainable solution by creating well-designed, inclusive communities that meet the needs of residents while minimizing strain on existing infrastructure.

Little did I know that a creeping strategy could be employed to circumvent regulatory constraints or oversight, such as avoiding the need for an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA)

A creeping strategy involves a methodical and incremental approach to achieving long-term objectives without attracting significant opposition or attention.

This strategy can be employed to circumvent regulatory constraints or oversight, such as avoiding the need for an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) in the context of village urbanisation.

By gradually expanding development in smaller increments over time, businesses or developers may seek to evade regulatory thresholds that would necessitate more extensive assessments or approvals, such as EIAs.

This incremental approach allows them to operate discreetly and minimize scrutiny while still accomplishing their long-term objectives, without controlled accountability for the impacts and effects of their actions.

TRANSPARENT INTRANSPARENCY

And if caught stealing by hand, insist it’s not your hand

The use of dormant companies and entering partnerships could potentially be part of this strategy to conceal such practices.

EIA: What Is It?

The primary goal of an EIA is to identify and assess the likely environmental impacts of a proposed project and to inform the public and all other stakeholders about these effects.

It allows decision-makers to validate whether the proposed project would contribute positively to the community.

Never underestimate the significance of the negative environmental impact of ‘piecemeal’ developments collectively creeping into villages

While individual housing developments may have relatively small environmental impacts on their own, their collective impact when combined with other developments in the area is often significant. An EIA should assess the cumulative effects of multiple developments to understand their overall impact on the environment.

#cumulative-effects #infrastructure-and-services #environmental-resources #social-and-economic-impacts

The Concept of Sustainable Development: Why Are EIAs So Important?

Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) plays a crucial role in sustainable development by helping to ensure that proposed projects and developments are evaluated in terms of their potential environmental, social, and economic impacts before they are approved and implemented.

The Brundtland Report defined sustainable development as “development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.”

The overly convoluted national and local policies create an environment conducive to organised abuse and workarounds

Just as organizations conduct root cause analysis to identify the primary contributors to defects, Planning authorities can and should conduct thorough assessments of national and local policies to pinpoint specific areas where improvements are most needed. This analysis can help streamline processes, eliminate redundancies, and enhance clarity and consistency in regulations.

To EIA or not to EIA, that is the screening application question

The purpose of a screening opinion is NOT to tailor information and argue AGAINST the need for an EIA.

Such abusive conduct is contrary to the principles of sustainable development. It raises serious concerns about environmental impacts and demands public opposition.

It is an initial assessment phase that helps regulatory authorities decide if the potential environmental impacts of a project are significant enough to warrant a comprehensive EIA.

Why are monopolistic practices prevalent in the UK housing market?

The UK faces a heightened risk of monopolistic practices in its housing market. When housing is scarce, demand often outstrips supply, leading to intensified competition among buyers and renters. In such scenarios, developers and landlords may wield greater influence over terms and prices, potentially stifling market competition….WE CALL FOR A NATIONAL AUDIT of the new housing market!

Why are monopolistic practices prevalent in the UK housing market?

Governmental policies and regulations play a significant role in shaping the accessibility of the housing market to different players, including smaller individuals or organizations. Policies that promote:

  • land availability,
  • support for self-build projects,
  • incentives for affordable housing, and
  • initiatives to facilitate community-led housing schemes

can help diversify the housing market and provide opportunities for smaller players to participate.


In the absence of supportive policies, the housing market has become increasingly dominated by large developers who possess the resources and capacity to navigate complex regulatory environments and capitalize on market demand.

This concentration of power among major developers exacerbates issues such as housing affordability, supply shortages, and the lack of diversity in housing options.


By implementing policies that promote competition, innovation, and inclusivity in the housing market, governments can help address these challenges and create a more balanced and sustainable housing ecosystem.

Encouraging initiatives that empower individuals or smaller groups to participate in housing development, such as self-build projects or cooperative housing models, can contribute to a more equitable distribution of housing opportunities and address the needs of diverse communities.


WE CALL FOR A NATIONAL AUDIT of the new housing market!

In the UK’s new housing development sector, transparency is often lacking for many.

In the UK, monopolies are generally not illegal per se. However, certain actions or behaviours associated with monopolies, such as abusing market dominance or engaging in anti-competitive practices, are prohibited under UK competition law.

Under UK competition law, businesses are prohibited from abusing a dominant market position, which could harm consumers or other businesses.

Having dormant companies and entering partnerships could potentially be used as a strategy to conceal anti-competitive practices, although it would depend on the specific circumstances and intent behind such actions.

Here are some ways in which dormant companies and partnerships could be used in this context:

  • Market Segmentation: Companies may use dormant subsidiaries to enter into different market segments or geographic areas, allowing them to maintain dominance in certain markets without drawing attention to their overall market power.
  • Collusion: Companies may form partnerships or joint ventures with competitors to engage in collusive behaviour, such as price-fixing or market allocation. Dormant companies could be used as vehicles for coordinating anti-competitive activities without attracting attention.
  • Concealment of Market Dominance: A company with a dominant market position may create dormant subsidiaries or enter into partnerships with other firms to make its dominance less apparent. By spreading its activities across multiple entities, the company may seek to avoid scrutiny from regulators or competitors.

The UK faces a heightened risk of monopolistic practices in its housing market. When housing is scarce, demand often outstrips supply, leading to intensified competition among buyers and renters. In such scenarios, developers and landlords may wield greater influence over terms and prices, potentially stifling market competition.

Housing shortages can concentrate market power in the hands of a few major developers or landlords who control a significant share of available housing. This concentration may pave the way for monopolistic behavior, such as price-fixing or limiting consumer options.

Moreover, barriers to entry for new developers or landlords may be elevated due to factors like limited land availability, planning constraints, and soaring construction costs. This could solidify the positions of existing market players, making it challenging for newcomers to compete.

In times of housing scarcity, developers or landlords might be tempted to engage in collusion or price-fixing to uphold inflated prices or rental rates. Consequently, consumers may end up paying artificially high prices without the benefits of competitive pricing.

Hence, a national audit of the new housing market to scrutinise potential irregularities, including monopolistic practices, is imperative.

Such an audit would entail a thorough assessment of market dynamics, competition levels, pricing structures, and regulatory adherence to ensure fairness and transparency across the industry.

It stands as the primary means to assess the efficacy of current regulations and policies aimed at bolstering housing supply, fostering competition, and safeguarding consumer interests, thereby mitigating the risk of monopolistic behaviour in the housing sector.

Little did I know that a creeping strategy could be employed to circumvent regulatory constraints or oversight, such as avoiding the need for an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA)

By gradually expanding development in smaller increments over time, businesses or developers may seek to evade regulatory thresholds that would necessitate more extensive assessments or approvals, such as EIAs.

The overly convoluted national and local policies create an environment conducive to organised abuse and workarounds

Just as organizations conduct root cause analysis to identify the primary contributors to defects, Planning authorities can and should conduct thorough assessments of national and local policies to pinpoint specific areas where improvements are most needed. This analysis can help streamline processes, eliminate redundancies, and enhance clarity and consistency in regulations.