ARCHAEOLOGY_ASSESSMENT-1335974.pdf


Key Points:

  • The site has archaeological potential due to its proximity to Romano-British and prehistoric remains.
  • Baseline research indicates low potential for significant archaeological remains.
  • Four Grade II listed buildings within 1km of the site, no scheduled monuments within the study area.
  • Field observations revealed no significant archaeological features.
  • Previous fieldwork in the vicinity found limited archaeological features, primarily of prehistoric and post-medieval periods.

Summary:

The archaeological assessment suggests that while there is some potential for archaeological remains, the significance is likely low. The proposed development includes measures for archaeological mitigation to assess and record any deposits found during construction.

Weak Points:

  • Limited archaeological fieldwork on-site could mean unexpected finds during construction, potentially causing delays.
  • The presence of nearby listed buildings necessitates careful consideration to avoid impact on their settings.

What aspects should be evaluated in relation to this document?

HERITAGE AND CONSERVATION


Assess Potential Archaeological Findings:

  • Evaluate the likelihood of discovering archaeological artifacts or features within the development site. This involves assessing the site’s historical significance and any previous findings in the area.

Review Protection Measures for Archaeological Sites:

  • Ensure that there are adequate measures in place to protect any potential archaeological sites during construction. This includes plans for excavation, documentation, and preservation of artifacts.

Evaluate Historical Significance:

  • Assess the historical significance of the site based on the findings of the archaeological assessment. This includes understanding the cultural and historical context of any discovered artifacts or features.

Review Conservation Strategies:

  • Ensure that there are robust strategies in place for the conservation of archaeological findings. This might include on-site preservation, relocation, or documentation and display in local museums or heritage centers.

Ensure Compliance with Heritage Laws:

  • Verify that the archaeological assessment complies with all relevant heritage and conservation laws and regulations. This includes obtaining necessary permits and adhering to guidelines for excavation and preservation.

Review Documentation and Reporting Requirements:

  • Ensure that the archaeological assessment includes thorough documentation and reporting of findings, as required by regulatory bodies. This documentation is essential for legal compliance and historical records.

DESIGN AND APPEARANCE


Evaluate Integration with Development Plans:

  • Assess how the potential for archaeological findings will be integrated into the overall development plans. Ensure that the design allows for the preservation of significant archaeological sites and features.

Consider Impact on Historical Landscape:

  • Review how the development might impact the historical landscape and visual appearance of the area. The design should respect and enhance the historical context of the site.

INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICES


Assess Impact on Construction and Development Schedule:

  • Consider how archaeological assessments and potential findings might affect the construction timeline and development schedule. Plans should include contingencies for delays related to archaeological work.

Review Coordination with Infrastructure Planning:

  • Ensure that the archaeological assessment is coordinated with infrastructure planning, particularly in areas where significant findings might alter the placement of utilities and services.

RESIDENTIAL AMENITY


Review Community Involvement:

  • Consider how the community has been involved in the planning process. Ensure that there has been adequate consultation and that community feedback has been incorporated into the plan.

Consider Public Interest and Involvement:

  • Evaluate how the community has been informed and involved in the archaeological assessment process. Public interest in local history can be a valuable asset in promoting community support for the project.

Review Educational and Interpretive Opportunities:

  • Assess opportunities for using archaeological findings for educational and interpretive purposes. This might include creating informational displays, tours, or integrating findings into community programs.

Disclaimer


ARBORICULTURAL_IMPACT_APPRAISAL_AND_METHOD_SATEMENT-1335971 — SGN-1-Monitoring-V3.pdf

Monitoring Tree Protection (SGN 1)


Establishes:

  • Procedures for monitoring tree protection, including pre-commencement meetings, site visits, and regular checks.
  • Importance of involving a supervising arboriculturist to oversee protection measures.

Weak Points:

  • The reliance on regular monitoring and supervision might be compromised if not strictly enforced.
  • Any lapses in monitoring could lead to unauthorised damage to protected trees.

What aspects should be evaluated in relation to this document?

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT


Evaluate Tree Health Monitoring:

Ensure that the document includes comprehensive guidelines for regularly monitoring the health of trees within Root Protection Areas (RPAs) during construction. This is crucial for early detection of stress or damage to trees.

DESIGN AND APPEARANCE


Assess Integration of Monitoring Practices:

Check how the proposed monitoring practices will be integrated into the construction process without negatively impacting the design and appearance of the site.

RESIDENTIAL AMENITY


Review Impact on Residents:

Consider how the monitoring activities will affect the residents, especially in terms of noise and access to green spaces. Ensure that the practices do not disrupt the community unnecessarily.


Disclaimer


ARBORICULTURAL_IMPACT_APPRAISAL_AND_METHOD_SATEMENT-1335971 — SGN-2-Fencing-V3.pdf

Fencing Protected Trees (SGN 2)


Establishes:

  • Specifications for installing temporary protective fencing around tree root protection areas (RPAs).
  • Importance of keeping fencing in place throughout construction activities.

Weak Points:

  • Potential for unauthorised removal or alteration of fencing without proper supervision.
  • Regular maintenance and checks are crucial to ensure the fencing remains effective.

What aspects should be evaluated in relation to this document?

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT


Evaluate Protective Measures:

Ensure the document details effective fencing methods to protect RPAs from construction activities. Proper fencing is essential to prevent damage to tree roots and soil compaction.

DESIGN AND APPEARANCE


Assess Aesthetic Impact:

Review the design of the fencing to ensure it is both functional and visually unobtrusive. The fencing should blend with the surroundings to maintain the aesthetic quality of the site.

RESIDENTIAL AMENITY


Consider Community Impact:

Evaluate how the fencing will affect residents’ access to green spaces and whether it maintains a safe and appealing environment around the development site.


Disclaimer


ARBORICULTURAL_IMPACT_APPRAISAL_AND_METHOD_SATEMENT-1335971 — SGN-3-Ground-Protection-V3.pdf

Ground Protection (SGN 3)


Establishes:

  • Methods for protecting the ground and tree root systems from compaction and damage during construction.
  • Use of various materials and techniques to maintain soil integrity and support tree health.

Weak Points:

  • Effectiveness depends on proper installation and maintenance of ground protection measures.
  • Risk of soil compaction if ground protection is not adequately implemented.

What aspects should be evaluated in relation to this document?

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT


Review Ground Protection Techniques:

Assess the methods proposed for ground protection to prevent soil compaction and root damage. Ensure they support the long-term health of trees in RPAs.

DESIGN AND APPEARANCE


Check Compatibility with Design:

Evaluate how ground protection measures will be integrated into the overall design. They should not detract from the site’s visual appeal or functionality.

RESIDENTIAL AMENITY


Impact on Usability:

Consider how ground protection measures affect the usability of the space for residents, ensuring paths and recreational areas remain accessible and attractive.


Disclaimer


ARBORICULTURAL_IMPACT_APPRAISAL_AND_METHOD_SATEMENT-1335971 — SGN-4-Pollution-V3.pdf

Pollution Control (SGN 4)


Establishes:

  • Measures to prevent contamination of RPAs from pollutants such as cement, chemicals, and vehicle washings.
  • Importance of implementing pollution control measures to avoid root damage and soil contamination.

Weak Points:

  • Risk of pollution control measures being insufficient or not properly maintained.
  • Any spills or contamination incidents could have significant long-term impacts on tree health.

What aspects should be evaluated in relation to this document?

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT


Evaluate Pollution Control Measures:

Ensure the document outlines effective measures to prevent soil and water contamination during construction, protecting the local ecosystem.

DESIGN AND APPEARANCE


Assess Integration of Pollution Controls:

Check how pollution control measures are integrated into the design, ensuring they do not negatively impact the visual and functional aspects of the development.

RESIDENTIAL AMENITY


Review Community Safety and Health:

Evaluate how the proposed pollution control measures will protect residents’ health and safety, ensuring a clean and safe living environment.


Disclaimer


ARBORICULTURAL_IMPACT_APPRAISAL_AND_METHOD_SATEMENT-1335971 — SGN-5-Cranes-Rigs-V3.pdf

Site Cranes and Piling Rigs (SGN 5)


Establishes:

  • Precautions to prevent damage to tree branches and trunks from cranes and piling rigs.
  • Use of banksmen and facilitation pruning to avoid contact with trees.

Weak Points:

  • Potential for human error or inadequate supervision leading to accidental damage.
  • Ensuring all operatives are properly trained and briefed on tree protection protocols.

What aspects should be evaluated in relation to this document?

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT


Review Equipment Use Guidelines:

Assess the guidelines for using cranes and rigs within RPAs to ensure they minimize soil compaction and root damage.

DESIGN AND APPEARANCE


Evaluate Visual Impact:

Check how the presence and operation of cranes and rigs will impact the site’s appearance during construction. Measures should be taken to minimize visual disruption.

RESIDENTIAL AMENITY


Consider Noise and Safety:

Review the impact of using heavy machinery on residents, focusing on noise levels and safety measures to mitigate any negative effects.


Disclaimer


ARBORICULTURAL_IMPACT_APPRAISAL_AND_METHOD_SATEMENT-1335971 — SGN-6-Height-V3.pdf

Height Restrictions (SGN 6)


Establishes:

  • Height restrictions for vehicles and equipment to prevent damage to low tree branches.
  • Use of height restriction bars and careful planning of access routes.

Weak Points:

  • Risk of vehicles exceeding height restrictions and causing damage.
  • Proper enforcement and monitoring are crucial to prevent accidental impacts.

What aspects should be evaluated in relation to this document?

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT


Assess Height Restrictions:

Ensure the document specifies appropriate height restrictions for machinery and structures to prevent damage to tree canopies and habitats.

DESIGN AND APPEARANCE


Review Impact on Visual Landscape:

Evaluate how height restrictions will affect the design and skyline of the development, ensuring a harmonious integration with the existing environment.

RESIDENTIAL AMENITY


Consider Visual Privacy:

Assess how the height of structures and machinery might impact residents’ privacy and views, ensuring the development maintains a respectful relationship with neighbouring properties.


Disclaimer


ARBORICULTURAL_IMPACT_APPRAISAL_AND_METHOD_SATEMENT-1335971 — SGN-9-Installing-Surfacing-V3.pdf

Installing/Upgrading Surfacing in RPAs (SGN 9)


Establishes:

  • Guidelines for installing new surfacing or upgrading existing surfacing in RPAs while minimising root damage.
  • Recommends the use of three-dimensional cellular confinement systems filled with washed stone to distribute loads and avoid soil compaction.
  • Advises against conventional surfacing installation methods that require excavation and compacting a supporting sub-base.
  • Provides options for edge retention that do not involve significant soil disturbance.

Weak Points:

  • Ensuring proper installation techniques and avoiding conventional methods that could damage roots is essential.
  • The effectiveness of proposed solutions depends on careful planning and execution to prevent compaction and maintain permeability.

What aspects should be evaluated in relation to this document?

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT


Review Surfacing Installation Methods:

Ensure the document outlines methods for installing new surfacing in RPAs to prevent root damage and soil compaction.

DESIGN AND APPEARANCE


Assess Integration with Design:

Evaluate how new surfacing will blend with the overall site design, ensuring it complements the aesthetic and functional aspects.

RESIDENTIAL AMENITY


Consider Usability and Safety:

Check how the new surfacing will affect residents’ use of the space, ensuring it enhances accessibility and safety.


Disclaimer


ARBORICULTURAL_IMPACT_APPRAISAL_AND_METHOD_SATEMENT-1335971 — SGN-7-Excavation-in-RPAs-V3.pdf

Excavation in Root Protection Areas (RPAs) (SGN 7)


Establishes:

  • Guidelines for conducting excavation within RPAs to minimize damage to tree roots.
  • Recommends the use of hand tools or compressed air soil displacement to avoid mechanical excavation.
  • Specifies that roots over 2.5 cm in diameter should only be cut with the approval of the supervising arboriculturist.
  • Protects exposed roots from drying out and temperature extremes using dampened hessian or similar coverings.

Weak Points:

  • The success of these measures heavily relies on strict adherence to guidelines and supervision.
  • Unauthorised or improper excavation practices could lead to significant damage to tree roots and compromise tree health.


What aspects should be evaluated in relation to this document?

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT


Review Excavation Practices:

Ensure the document outlines safe excavation practices within RPAs to minimize root damage and soil disruption.

DESIGN AND APPEARANCE


Assess Excavation Impact on Design:

Evaluate how the proposed excavation methods will integrate with the overall design, ensuring minimal visual and structural impact.

RESIDENTIAL AMENITY


Consider Construction Impact:

Review how excavation activities will affect residents, focusing on noise, dust, and accessibility. Measures should be taken to minimize disruption.


Disclaimer


ARBORICULTURAL_IMPACT_APPRAISAL_AND_METHOD_SATEMENT-1335971 — SGN-8-Removing-Surfaces-V3.pdf

Removing Surfacing and Structures in RPAs (SGN 8)


Establishes:

  • Procedures for safely removing surfacing and structures within RPAs without causing damage to roots.
  • Emphasises the importance of manual removal using appropriate tools and the use of machinery only from outside the RPAs.
  • Highlights the potential need to leave below-ground structures in place to avoid excessive disturbance.

Weak Points:

  • Risks associated with unauthorized removal or improper handling, leading to potential root damage.
  • Effective monitoring and compliance are critical to ensure the protection of roots during these activities.


What aspects should be evaluated in relation to this document?

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT


Evaluate Surface Removal Techniques:

Ensure the document includes methods for safely removing surfaces within RPAs to avoid damaging roots and soil.

DESIGN AND APPEARANCE


Assess Visual Impact:

Check how surface removal activities will affect the site’s appearance, ensuring they do not leave unsightly marks or disrupt the visual flow.

RESIDENTIAL AMENITY


Review Impact on Accessibility:

Evaluate how surface removal will impact residents’ access to different parts of the site, ensuring pathways and recreational areas remain usable.


Disclaimer