ARBORICULTURAL_IMPACT_APPRAISAL_AND_METHOD_SATEMENT-1335971 — SGN-8-Removing-Surfaces-V3.pdf

Removing Surfacing and Structures in RPAs (SGN 8)


Establishes:

  • Procedures for safely removing surfacing and structures within RPAs without causing damage to roots.
  • Emphasises the importance of manual removal using appropriate tools and the use of machinery only from outside the RPAs.
  • Highlights the potential need to leave below-ground structures in place to avoid excessive disturbance.

Weak Points:

  • Risks associated with unauthorized removal or improper handling, leading to potential root damage.
  • Effective monitoring and compliance are critical to ensure the protection of roots during these activities.


What aspects should be evaluated in relation to this document?

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT


Evaluate Surface Removal Techniques:

Ensure the document includes methods for safely removing surfaces within RPAs to avoid damaging roots and soil.

DESIGN AND APPEARANCE


Assess Visual Impact:

Check how surface removal activities will affect the site’s appearance, ensuring they do not leave unsightly marks or disrupt the visual flow.

RESIDENTIAL AMENITY


Review Impact on Accessibility:

Evaluate how surface removal will impact residents’ access to different parts of the site, ensuring pathways and recreational areas remain usable.


Disclaimer


APPENDIX_4_-_SUSTAINABILITY_CHECKLIST-1335970.pdf


Establishes:

Energy Efficiency: The checklist outlines proposed measures for achieving energy efficiency in the development, such as aiming for a minimum of 31% carbon reduction and integrating renewable energy technologies like air source heat pumps and photovoltaic panels.

Biodiversity: Commitment to achieving a minimum of 10% biodiversity net gain, with plans to incorporate water butts, sustainable drainage systems (SuDS), and maintain green infrastructure.

Construction Practices: Plans to consider sustainable sourcing of materials, waste management, and the potential reuse of building materials.

Weak Points:

Deferred Details: Many critical details, including specific energy efficiency measures and SuDS, are deferred to the Reserved Matters (RM) stage, which means there’s no immediate commitment to these measures.

Lack of Specific Commitments: While the document outlines intentions, it lacks specific, immediate commitments, creating uncertainty about the actual implementation and effectiveness of the proposed measures.

Potential Implementation Gaps: The success of the sustainability measures depends on detailed plans and execution at the RM stage, which might differ from the initial proposals.

What aspects should be evaluated in relation to this document?

Sustainability


Check if the checklist addresses the need for sustainable building practices and energy efficiency. Assess how these practices contribute to reducing the environmental impact of the development.

Environmental Impact


Evaluate the implementation of measures like Sustainable Drainage Systems (SuDS) and biodiversity net gain. Determine if these measures effectively support ecological balance and mitigate the environmental impact.

Infrastructure and Services


Examine how water efficiency and renewable energy technologies are integrated into the development. Consider their effectiveness in reducing demand on local infrastructure and promoting sustainable resource use.


Disclaimer


ARBORICULTURAL_IMPACT_APPRAISAL_AND_METHOD_SATEMENT-1335971 — SGN-12-Landscaping-V3.pdf

Landscaping in Root Protection Areas (SGN 12)


Establishes:

  • Guidelines for conducting landscaping activities within RPAs without causing harm to trees.
  • Emphasis on minimising soil disturbance and protecting root systems.

Weak Points:

  • Landscaping activities have a high potential for causing unintended damage if not carefully managed.
  • Ensuring all landscaping works are supervised and comply with arboricultural guidelines.

What aspects should be evaluated in relation to this document?

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT


Review Landscaping Practices:

Ensure the document includes guidelines for landscaping within RPAs that support biodiversity and environmental sustainability. The use of native plants and sustainable practices should be prioritised.

DESIGN AND APPEARANCE


Assess Aesthetic Integration:

Evaluate how the proposed landscaping will enhance the visual appeal of the development. Landscaping should complement the design and provide aesthetic value.

RESIDENTIAL AMENITY


Consider Community Benefits:

Assess how the landscaping plans will benefit residents, providing green spaces for recreation and improving the overall quality of life. Ensure that the landscaping is designed to be accessible and usable for all community members.


Disclaimer


ARBORICULTURAL_IMPACT_APPRAISAL_AND_METHOD_SATEMENT-1335971 — SGN-11-Services-V3.pdf

Installing Services in Root Protection Areas (RPAs) (SGN 11)


Establishes:

  • Guidelines for installing or upgrading services (e.g., utilities) within RPAs to avoid damage to tree roots.
  • Recommends trenchless installation methods (e.g., thrust boring) to prevent soil and root disturbance.
  • Advises hand-dug trenches as a fallback when trenchless methods are not feasible, with precautions to avoid significant root damage.
  • Provides methods to protect exposed roots during installation, such as using hessian for temporary protection.

Weak Points:

  • Ensuring proper installation techniques to prevent root damage is critical.
  • The effectiveness of trenchless and hand-dug methods relies on careful execution and supervision by an arboriculturist.
  • Backfilled material around excavated services must be managed to maintain permeability and avoid compaction.

What aspects should be evaluated in relation to this document?

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT


Evaluate Service Installation Methods:

Ensure the document outlines safe methods for installing services (e.g., utilities) within RPAs, focusing on minimizing root damage and soil disruption. Trenchless installation methods should be prioritised.

DESIGN AND APPEARANCE


Assess Integration with Design:

Check how the installation of services will integrate with the overall site design, ensuring that service routes are planned to minimize visual impact and disruption.

RESIDENTIAL AMENITY


Consider Impact on Residents:

Evaluate how the installation of services will affect residents, especially in terms of access and safety during the construction phase. Measures should be taken to minimize disruption and maintain the usability of the site.


Disclaimer


ARBORICULTURAL_IMPACT_APPRAISAL_AND_METHOD_SATEMENT-1335971 — SGN-10-Structures-V3.pdf

Installing Structures in Root Protection Areas (RPAs) (SGN 10)



Establishes:

  • Guidelines for installing new structures in RPAs while minimising root damage and soil disturbance.
  • Recommends using pile, pad, or post supports for substantial structures to minimize soil excavation.
  • Advises keeping existing below-ground structures to support new ones, reducing the need for new excavations.
  • Provides methods to ensure water and air input under substantial structures.


Weak Points:

  • Ensuring proper hand-digging techniques to avoid significant roots is essential.
  • The risk of compaction and chemical contamination must be managed carefully during installation.
  • The effectiveness of these methods depends on careful planning and adherence to guidelines to prevent root damage and soil compaction.

What aspects should be evaluated in relation to this document?

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT


Evaluate Structure Installation Methods:

Ensure the document includes methods for safely installing structures in RPAs, minimizing root damage and soil disturbance.

DESIGN AND APPEARANCE


Assess Compatibility with Design:

Check how the new structures will integrate with the overall site design, ensuring they enhance the aesthetic and functional aspects.

RESIDENTIAL AMENITY


Consider Impact on Residents:

Evaluate how the installation of new structures will affect residents, focusing on privacy, views, and access to green spaces.


Disclaimer


ARBORICULTURAL_IMPACT_APPRAISAL_AND_METHOD_SATEMENT-1335971.pdf

Document: ARBORICULTURAL_IMPACT_APPRAISAL_AND_METHOD_STATEMENT-1335971.pdf (Including multiple SGNs)


Establishes:

  • The necessity of protecting trees during construction to comply with environmental standards and regulations.
  • The potential impacts on trees and mitigation strategies to ensure minimal damage to the existing landscape.

Weak Points:

  • The effectiveness of mitigation measures might be questioned, especially if past attempts have shown inadequate results.
  • Implementation and adherence to these measures need thorough monitoring to ensure compliance.


What aspects should be evaluated in relation to this document?

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT


Evaluate Arboricultural Management Practices:

Ensure the document outlines comprehensive arboricultural management practices that protect tree health and soil stability during development. Practices should minimise environmental disruption and support biodiversity.

DESIGN AND APPEARANCE


Assess Compatibility with Site Design:

Check how the arboricultural management practices will integrate with the overall site design, ensuring that trees and green spaces are preserved and incorporated harmoniously into the development.

RESIDENTIAL AMENITY


Consider Impact on Community:

Evaluate how the arboricultural practices will affect residents, ensuring that they enhance the liveability of the development by providing green spaces and maintaining a healthy environment.


Disclaimer


Objection to Planning Application 27000-005 — 20240621 – 01.pdf


Environmental and Ecological Impact: This section discusses the impact on existing trees and biodiversity. It highlights concerns about protecting trees, which are crucial for climate change mitigation and maintaining visual amenity. Failure to protect these trees could lead to a deteriorating landscape and loss of biodiversity.

Archaeological Significance: This section addresses the potential for encountering Neolithic remains and recommends archaeological evaluations to protect any undiscovered assets. Preserving archaeological heritage is essential for maintaining the historical integrity of the area.

Flood Risk and Drainage: This section emphasises the need for robust drainage systems to manage increased runoff and prevent flood risk. It highlights the importance of designing drainage systems to handle extreme weather events and comply with climate change resilience standards.

Community and Social Impact: This section critiques the affordable housing provision, noting it falls short of local policy requirements. It also discusses the significant population increase from 2011 to 2024 and the lack of a comprehensive Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) to capture the cumulative effects on local infrastructure and services.

Public Services and Infrastructure: This section discusses the impact on local public footpaths, emphasising the need for contributions to improve their surface and maintenance to accommodate increased foot traffic from new residents.

Health and Safety: This section highlights fire safety concerns, emphasising the need for adequate access for firefighting appliances and sufficient water supplies. It also addresses the necessity of radon protection and conditions for land contamination management to ensure safety.

Healthcare Infrastructure: This section includes comments from the NHS about local GP surgeries’ capacity to absorb the population increase. It stresses the need to ensure that healthcare services remain adequate to support the growing population.




Disclaimer


ARBORICULTURE_OFFICER_S_COMMENTS-1338245.pdf


This document assesses the impact on trees within the proposed development site. It highlights concerns about the lack of long-term planning for newly planted trees and potential negative impacts on existing trees. Trees play a crucial role in mitigating climate change and maintaining visual amenity, which are key environmental considerations. The design and appearance of the development are also affected by how well trees are integrated and maintained within the landscape​​.




Disclaimer