ARBORICULTURAL_IMPACT_APPRAISAL_AND_METHOD_SATEMENT-1335971 — SGN-2-Fencing-V3.pdf

Fencing Protected Trees (SGN 2)


Establishes:

  • Specifications for installing temporary protective fencing around tree root protection areas (RPAs).
  • Importance of keeping fencing in place throughout construction activities.

Weak Points:

  • Potential for unauthorised removal or alteration of fencing without proper supervision.
  • Regular maintenance and checks are crucial to ensure the fencing remains effective.

What aspects should be evaluated in relation to this document?

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT


Evaluate Protective Measures:

Ensure the document details effective fencing methods to protect RPAs from construction activities. Proper fencing is essential to prevent damage to tree roots and soil compaction.

DESIGN AND APPEARANCE


Assess Aesthetic Impact:

Review the design of the fencing to ensure it is both functional and visually unobtrusive. The fencing should blend with the surroundings to maintain the aesthetic quality of the site.

RESIDENTIAL AMENITY


Consider Community Impact:

Evaluate how the fencing will affect residents’ access to green spaces and whether it maintains a safe and appealing environment around the development site.


Disclaimer


ARBORICULTURAL_IMPACT_APPRAISAL_AND_METHOD_SATEMENT-1335971 — SGN-3-Ground-Protection-V3.pdf

Ground Protection (SGN 3)


Establishes:

  • Methods for protecting the ground and tree root systems from compaction and damage during construction.
  • Use of various materials and techniques to maintain soil integrity and support tree health.

Weak Points:

  • Effectiveness depends on proper installation and maintenance of ground protection measures.
  • Risk of soil compaction if ground protection is not adequately implemented.

What aspects should be evaluated in relation to this document?

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT


Review Ground Protection Techniques:

Assess the methods proposed for ground protection to prevent soil compaction and root damage. Ensure they support the long-term health of trees in RPAs.

DESIGN AND APPEARANCE


Check Compatibility with Design:

Evaluate how ground protection measures will be integrated into the overall design. They should not detract from the site’s visual appeal or functionality.

RESIDENTIAL AMENITY


Impact on Usability:

Consider how ground protection measures affect the usability of the space for residents, ensuring paths and recreational areas remain accessible and attractive.


Disclaimer


ARBORICULTURAL_IMPACT_APPRAISAL_AND_METHOD_SATEMENT-1335971 — SGN-4-Pollution-V3.pdf

Pollution Control (SGN 4)


Establishes:

  • Measures to prevent contamination of RPAs from pollutants such as cement, chemicals, and vehicle washings.
  • Importance of implementing pollution control measures to avoid root damage and soil contamination.

Weak Points:

  • Risk of pollution control measures being insufficient or not properly maintained.
  • Any spills or contamination incidents could have significant long-term impacts on tree health.

What aspects should be evaluated in relation to this document?

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT


Evaluate Pollution Control Measures:

Ensure the document outlines effective measures to prevent soil and water contamination during construction, protecting the local ecosystem.

DESIGN AND APPEARANCE


Assess Integration of Pollution Controls:

Check how pollution control measures are integrated into the design, ensuring they do not negatively impact the visual and functional aspects of the development.

RESIDENTIAL AMENITY


Review Community Safety and Health:

Evaluate how the proposed pollution control measures will protect residents’ health and safety, ensuring a clean and safe living environment.


Disclaimer


ARBORICULTURAL_IMPACT_APPRAISAL_AND_METHOD_SATEMENT-1335971 — SGN-5-Cranes-Rigs-V3.pdf

Site Cranes and Piling Rigs (SGN 5)


Establishes:

  • Precautions to prevent damage to tree branches and trunks from cranes and piling rigs.
  • Use of banksmen and facilitation pruning to avoid contact with trees.

Weak Points:

  • Potential for human error or inadequate supervision leading to accidental damage.
  • Ensuring all operatives are properly trained and briefed on tree protection protocols.

What aspects should be evaluated in relation to this document?

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT


Review Equipment Use Guidelines:

Assess the guidelines for using cranes and rigs within RPAs to ensure they minimize soil compaction and root damage.

DESIGN AND APPEARANCE


Evaluate Visual Impact:

Check how the presence and operation of cranes and rigs will impact the site’s appearance during construction. Measures should be taken to minimize visual disruption.

RESIDENTIAL AMENITY


Consider Noise and Safety:

Review the impact of using heavy machinery on residents, focusing on noise levels and safety measures to mitigate any negative effects.


Disclaimer


ARBORICULTURAL_IMPACT_APPRAISAL_AND_METHOD_SATEMENT-1335971 — SGN-6-Height-V3.pdf

Height Restrictions (SGN 6)


Establishes:

  • Height restrictions for vehicles and equipment to prevent damage to low tree branches.
  • Use of height restriction bars and careful planning of access routes.

Weak Points:

  • Risk of vehicles exceeding height restrictions and causing damage.
  • Proper enforcement and monitoring are crucial to prevent accidental impacts.

What aspects should be evaluated in relation to this document?

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT


Assess Height Restrictions:

Ensure the document specifies appropriate height restrictions for machinery and structures to prevent damage to tree canopies and habitats.

DESIGN AND APPEARANCE


Review Impact on Visual Landscape:

Evaluate how height restrictions will affect the design and skyline of the development, ensuring a harmonious integration with the existing environment.

RESIDENTIAL AMENITY


Consider Visual Privacy:

Assess how the height of structures and machinery might impact residents’ privacy and views, ensuring the development maintains a respectful relationship with neighbouring properties.


Disclaimer


ARBORICULTURAL_IMPACT_APPRAISAL_AND_METHOD_SATEMENT-1335971 — SGN-9-Installing-Surfacing-V3.pdf

Installing/Upgrading Surfacing in RPAs (SGN 9)


Establishes:

  • Guidelines for installing new surfacing or upgrading existing surfacing in RPAs while minimising root damage.
  • Recommends the use of three-dimensional cellular confinement systems filled with washed stone to distribute loads and avoid soil compaction.
  • Advises against conventional surfacing installation methods that require excavation and compacting a supporting sub-base.
  • Provides options for edge retention that do not involve significant soil disturbance.

Weak Points:

  • Ensuring proper installation techniques and avoiding conventional methods that could damage roots is essential.
  • The effectiveness of proposed solutions depends on careful planning and execution to prevent compaction and maintain permeability.

What aspects should be evaluated in relation to this document?

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT


Review Surfacing Installation Methods:

Ensure the document outlines methods for installing new surfacing in RPAs to prevent root damage and soil compaction.

DESIGN AND APPEARANCE


Assess Integration with Design:

Evaluate how new surfacing will blend with the overall site design, ensuring it complements the aesthetic and functional aspects.

RESIDENTIAL AMENITY


Consider Usability and Safety:

Check how the new surfacing will affect residents’ use of the space, ensuring it enhances accessibility and safety.


Disclaimer


ARBORICULTURAL_IMPACT_APPRAISAL_AND_METHOD_SATEMENT-1335971 — SGN-7-Excavation-in-RPAs-V3.pdf

Excavation in Root Protection Areas (RPAs) (SGN 7)


Establishes:

  • Guidelines for conducting excavation within RPAs to minimize damage to tree roots.
  • Recommends the use of hand tools or compressed air soil displacement to avoid mechanical excavation.
  • Specifies that roots over 2.5 cm in diameter should only be cut with the approval of the supervising arboriculturist.
  • Protects exposed roots from drying out and temperature extremes using dampened hessian or similar coverings.

Weak Points:

  • The success of these measures heavily relies on strict adherence to guidelines and supervision.
  • Unauthorised or improper excavation practices could lead to significant damage to tree roots and compromise tree health.


What aspects should be evaluated in relation to this document?

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT


Review Excavation Practices:

Ensure the document outlines safe excavation practices within RPAs to minimize root damage and soil disruption.

DESIGN AND APPEARANCE


Assess Excavation Impact on Design:

Evaluate how the proposed excavation methods will integrate with the overall design, ensuring minimal visual and structural impact.

RESIDENTIAL AMENITY


Consider Construction Impact:

Review how excavation activities will affect residents, focusing on noise, dust, and accessibility. Measures should be taken to minimize disruption.


Disclaimer


ARBORICULTURAL_IMPACT_APPRAISAL_AND_METHOD_SATEMENT-1335971 — SGN-8-Removing-Surfaces-V3.pdf

Removing Surfacing and Structures in RPAs (SGN 8)


Establishes:

  • Procedures for safely removing surfacing and structures within RPAs without causing damage to roots.
  • Emphasises the importance of manual removal using appropriate tools and the use of machinery only from outside the RPAs.
  • Highlights the potential need to leave below-ground structures in place to avoid excessive disturbance.

Weak Points:

  • Risks associated with unauthorized removal or improper handling, leading to potential root damage.
  • Effective monitoring and compliance are critical to ensure the protection of roots during these activities.


What aspects should be evaluated in relation to this document?

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT


Evaluate Surface Removal Techniques:

Ensure the document includes methods for safely removing surfaces within RPAs to avoid damaging roots and soil.

DESIGN AND APPEARANCE


Assess Visual Impact:

Check how surface removal activities will affect the site’s appearance, ensuring they do not leave unsightly marks or disrupt the visual flow.

RESIDENTIAL AMENITY


Review Impact on Accessibility:

Evaluate how surface removal will impact residents’ access to different parts of the site, ensuring pathways and recreational areas remain usable.


Disclaimer


ARBORICULTURAL_IMPACT_APPRAISAL_AND_METHOD_SATEMENT-1335971 — SGN-12-Landscaping-V3.pdf

Landscaping in Root Protection Areas (SGN 12)


Establishes:

  • Guidelines for conducting landscaping activities within RPAs without causing harm to trees.
  • Emphasis on minimising soil disturbance and protecting root systems.

Weak Points:

  • Landscaping activities have a high potential for causing unintended damage if not carefully managed.
  • Ensuring all landscaping works are supervised and comply with arboricultural guidelines.

What aspects should be evaluated in relation to this document?

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT


Review Landscaping Practices:

Ensure the document includes guidelines for landscaping within RPAs that support biodiversity and environmental sustainability. The use of native plants and sustainable practices should be prioritised.

DESIGN AND APPEARANCE


Assess Aesthetic Integration:

Evaluate how the proposed landscaping will enhance the visual appeal of the development. Landscaping should complement the design and provide aesthetic value.

RESIDENTIAL AMENITY


Consider Community Benefits:

Assess how the landscaping plans will benefit residents, providing green spaces for recreation and improving the overall quality of life. Ensure that the landscaping is designed to be accessible and usable for all community members.


Disclaimer


ARBORICULTURAL_IMPACT_APPRAISAL_AND_METHOD_SATEMENT-1335971 — SGN-11-Services-V3.pdf

Installing Services in Root Protection Areas (RPAs) (SGN 11)


Establishes:

  • Guidelines for installing or upgrading services (e.g., utilities) within RPAs to avoid damage to tree roots.
  • Recommends trenchless installation methods (e.g., thrust boring) to prevent soil and root disturbance.
  • Advises hand-dug trenches as a fallback when trenchless methods are not feasible, with precautions to avoid significant root damage.
  • Provides methods to protect exposed roots during installation, such as using hessian for temporary protection.

Weak Points:

  • Ensuring proper installation techniques to prevent root damage is critical.
  • The effectiveness of trenchless and hand-dug methods relies on careful execution and supervision by an arboriculturist.
  • Backfilled material around excavated services must be managed to maintain permeability and avoid compaction.

What aspects should be evaluated in relation to this document?

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT


Evaluate Service Installation Methods:

Ensure the document outlines safe methods for installing services (e.g., utilities) within RPAs, focusing on minimizing root damage and soil disruption. Trenchless installation methods should be prioritised.

DESIGN AND APPEARANCE


Assess Integration with Design:

Check how the installation of services will integrate with the overall site design, ensuring that service routes are planned to minimize visual impact and disruption.

RESIDENTIAL AMENITY


Consider Impact on Residents:

Evaluate how the installation of services will affect residents, especially in terms of access and safety during the construction phase. Measures should be taken to minimize disruption and maintain the usability of the site.


Disclaimer