Objection – 20240623 – 04 — Due to Public Health Concerns.pdf



Material Considerations Used in the Objection, Grouped by Main Categories


  • Mental Health and Well-being: Stress and anxiety from continuous construction.
  • Noise Pollution: Health risks and cognitive impairment from prolonged noise.
  • Community Disruption: Social isolation and disrupted access to services.
  • Air Quality and Respiratory Health: Construction dust and emissions impacting vulnerable populations.
  • Lack of Transparency and Consultation: Undermined public trust due to inadequate consultation.

Disclaimer


Objection – 20240623 – 06 — Based on Deliverability and Sustainability Concerns.pdf



Material Considerations Used in the Objection, Grouped by Main Categories


  • Ecological Impact and Sustainability: Concerns over outdated data and insufficient sustainability measures.
  • Environmental and Flood Risks: Historical flooding issues inadequately addressed.
  • Infrastructure and Service Strain: Inaccurate housing supply figures and repurposed NHS comments.
  • Public Opinion and Community Impact: Significant community opposition and manipulated feedback.
  • Archaeological Concerns: Insufficient mitigation for potential archaeological findings.

Disclaimer


Objection – 20240623 – 05 — Based on the Ecological Impact Assessment.pdf



Material Considerations Used in the Objection, Grouped by Main Categories


  • Significant Biodiversity Net Loss: High loss of biodiversity contrary to planning policies.
  • Insufficient Mitigation and Compensation Measures: Lack of detailed, enforceable plans.
  • Potential Adverse Effects on Local Wildlife: Risks to protected species with inadequate mitigation.
  • Cumulative Impact with Previous Developments: Additional habitat loss and urbanisation.
  • Impact on Non-Statutory Designated Sites: Risks to nearby nature conservation sites.
  • Inadequate Consideration of In-Combination Effects: Lack of comprehensive assessment of cumulative impacts.

Disclaimer


Objection – 20240623 – 03 — Due to Traffic and Access, Flood Risk and Community Impact Concerns.pdf



Material Considerations Used in the Objection, Grouped by Main Categories


  • Outdated Traffic Data: Reliance on outdated surveys.
  • Survey Methods: Scrutiny of survey methods for accuracy.
  • Feasibility of Mitigation Measures: Evaluation of proposed road improvements.
  • Cumulative Impact: Assessment of cumulative traffic impacts.
  • Existing Flooding Problems: Ongoing flooding issues at Beechlands Road and Redhill junction.
  • Exacerbation of Flooding Issues: Concerns over increased flooding from new development.
  • Lack of Detailed Plans: Insufficient flood risk mitigation details.
  • Impact on Local Infrastructure: Strain on local services and amenities.
  • Safety and Accessibility: Risks from flooding affecting safety and access.

Disclaimer


Objection – 20240623 – 02 — Due to Inadequate Community Involvement and Lack of Trust.pdf



Material Considerations Used in the Objection, Grouped by Main Categories


  • Limited and Biased Consultation Reach: Insufficient and potentially biased community engagement.
  • Superficial Responses to Concerns: Developer’s inadequate responses to community concerns.
  • Manipulated Feedback: Lack of trust in the consultation practices.
  • Fear of Voicing Opinions: Residents fear repercussions for voicing concerns.

Disclaimer


CONSTRAINTS_AND_OPPORTUNITIES_PLAN-1335979.pdf

Constraints and Opportunities Plan


The Constraints and Opportunities Plan visually represents various key features and considerations for the proposed development site. This plan is essential for understanding the limitations and potential enhancements for the project. Key elements marked on the map include:

  1. Site Boundary: The outer limits of the development area are clearly defined.
  2. Site Access: Points of entry and exit to the site are indicated, ensuring accessibility.
  3. Public Rights of Way (Bridleway): Existing public paths available for use, particularly for horse riding, are highlighted.
  4. Proposed 2m Footpath: New pedestrian pathways are planned to improve accessibility within the site.
  5. Existing Vehicular Route: Current roads and pathways used by vehicles within the site are marked.
  6. Existing Trees:
    • Category A and B: High and moderate-quality trees that are significant for retention are shown.
    • Category C: Low-quality trees or those with limited life expectancy are also identified.
  7. Root Protection Area for Category A and B Trees: Zones designated to protect the roots of important trees during construction.
  8. Potential Green Arrival Space: Proposed areas for green, welcoming spaces at entry points to enhance the aesthetic and ecological value.
  9. Opportunity for Single Storey Development: Identified areas suitable for the development of single-story buildings, ensuring that the scale of development is appropriate for the context.
  10. Indicative Contours: Topographical information showing the landscape’s elevation changes, helping to understand the site’s natural form.
  11. Views:
    • Views Out to Open Countryside: Areas with scenic views of the surrounding countryside.
    • Partial Public Views into the Site: Locations where the public can partially see into the site.
    • Open Public Views into the Site: Spots offering full views into the site for the public.
  12. Local Green Space: Stoney Lane Strip: A designated local green area within or adjacent to the development site.
  13. Low Surface Water Flood Risk Zone: Areas identified as having minimal risk of flooding from surface water.
  14. Existing Public Foul Sewer: Locations of current sewage infrastructure, important for planning utility connections.
  15. Existing Trees and Hedgerows to be Safeguarded and Strengthened: Areas where existing vegetation is to be preserved and enhanced.
  16. Potential Ecological Buffer of Minimum 2m: Suggested buffer zones to protect ecological features, ensuring a minimum distance to mitigate environmental impact.
  17. Proposed Landscape Buffers:
    • To Local Green Space/Cawk House and Retained/Enhanced Vegetation: Buffers to integrate the development with the surrounding natural areas.
    • To Bridleway and Retained/Enhanced Vegetation: Buffers along the bridleway to protect and enhance the existing vegetation.

Key Features and Notations on the Map:

  • The map includes notations and symbols for various features, providing a clear visual guide to the development constraints and opportunities.
  • Areas with different colours and patterns indicate specific zones and features, such as green spaces, footpaths, and vehicular routes.
  • The plan incorporates existing natural features like trees and hedgerows, ensuring their protection and integration into the development.

This plan serves as a comprehensive guide for planners, developers, and stakeholders, ensuring that the development respects existing natural features and infrastructure while capitalising on opportunities to enhance the site’s environmental and social value.

Weak Points:

  1. Potential Overlook of Smaller Ecological Features:
  • The focus may primarily be on major ecological features (e.g., Category A and B trees), potentially overlooking smaller but still significant ecological components.

2. Risk of Inadequate Buffer Zones:

  • The suggested buffer zones might not be sufficient in all areas to protect sensitive ecological zones from construction impact.

3. Limited Detail on Soil and Water Management:

  • The plan might lack comprehensive details on managing soil erosion and water runoff, especially in areas marked as low surface water flood risk zones.

4. Potential Public Access Challenges:

  • While public rights of way and footpaths are indicated, there may be challenges in ensuring these are adequately accessible during all phases of development.

5. Integration of Proposed and Existing Infrastructure:

  • The plan may not fully address how new infrastructure will integrate with existing systems, particularly concerning utilities and roadways.

What aspects should be evaluated in relation to this document?

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT


Assess Protection Measures for Ecological Features:

  • Ensure that the protection measures for Category A and B trees, as well as other significant vegetation, are robust and comprehensive. Verify that the Root Protection Areas (RPAs) are adequate and effectively managed.

Evaluate Buffer Zone Adequacy:

  • Review the proposed ecological buffer zones to determine if they provide sufficient protection for sensitive habitats and ecological corridors. Consider increasing the buffer zones if necessary to ensure environmental protection.

Review Soil and Water Management Plans:

  • Ensure the plan includes detailed strategies for managing soil erosion and water runoff, particularly in areas identified as low surface water flood risk zones. These measures are crucial to prevent environmental degradation during and after construction.

DESIGN AND APPEARANCE


Evaluate Integration of Green Spaces:

  • Assess how well the proposed green arrival spaces and landscape buffers integrate with the overall design of the development. These elements should enhance the visual appeal and provide functional green areas for residents and wildlife.

Check Compatibility of Single-Storey Development Opportunities:

  • Ensure that the areas identified for single-storey development fit within the context of the surrounding environment and community. The design should complement the existing landscape and built environment.

Consider Views and Sightlines:

  • Evaluate the impact of the development on key views, including views out to the countryside and public views into the site. The development should enhance rather than obstruct these views, maintaining a visual connection with the natural surroundings.

RESIDENTIAL AMENITY


Review Accessibility and Connectivity:

  • Assess the accessibility of the proposed footpaths, bridleways, and vehicular routes. Ensure that these routes are well-integrated into the existing infrastructure and provide safe, convenient access for all residents.

Evaluate Impact on Local Green Space Usage:

  • Consider how the development will impact the usage of local green spaces, such as the Stoney Lane Strip. Ensure that these areas remain accessible and enjoyable for the community.

Consider Impact on Resident Experience:

  • Evaluate how the proposed development will affect the overall living experience of residents, including aspects like noise, privacy, and access to nature. The development should enhance residential amenity by providing well-designed, accessible, and attractive green spaces.

Community Engagement:

  • Review Community Involvement: Consider how the community has been involved in the planning process. Ensure that there has been adequate consultation and that community feedback has been incorporated into the plan.

Health and Wellbeing:

  • Assess Impact on Public Health: Evaluate how the development will impact public health, including access to green spaces, recreational areas, and clean air. Ensure that the design promotes healthy living environments.

Additional Material Considerations


Evaluate Traffic Flow and Safety:

Assess how the proposed vehicular routes and access points will impact traffic flow and safety within and around the development site. Ensure that the design minimises congestion and provides safe access for vehicles and pedestrians.

Review Public Rights of Way:

Ensure that public rights of way, such as bridleways and footpaths, are adequately maintained and integrated into the development. Consider any potential disruptions and plan for safe and accessible routes during construction.

Assess Utility Integration:

Evaluate how existing utilities (e.g., public foul sewers) will be integrated with new infrastructure. Ensure that the development does not overburden existing services and includes plans for any necessary upgrades.

Review Drainage and Flood Risk Management:

Examine the strategies for managing surface water drainage and flood risk, especially in areas identified as low surface water flood risk zones. Ensure that the development includes sustainable drainage systems (SuDS) and other measures to mitigate flood risks.

Promote Sustainable Building Practices:

Check if the plan encourages the use of sustainable building practices and materials. Evaluate how these practices contribute to reducing the environmental footprint of the development.

Evaluate Energy Efficiency Measures:

Assess the proposed development’s energy efficiency measures, such as the inclusion of renewable energy sources and energy-efficient building designs.

Assess Impact on Heritage Sites:

Evaluate if there are any nearby heritage sites or conservation areas that could be affected by the development. Ensure that the design respects and preserves the historical and cultural significance of these areas.


Disclaimer


ACCESS_AND_MOVEMENT_PARAMETER_PLAN-1335984.pdf


It is a detailed map outlining various access and movement networks for the proposed development.

The key elements shown in the plan include:

  • Site Boundary: The outer limits of the development area.
  • Vehicular Access: Points where vehicles can enter and exit the development.
  • Pedestrian Access: Entry points and pathways specifically for pedestrians.
  • Cycle Access: Designated entry points and routes for cyclists.
  • Primary Street: The main roads within the development.
  • Secondary Street: Smaller roads branching from the primary streets.
  • Shared Surface Street: Streets designed to be shared by vehicles, pedestrians, and cyclists.
  • Private Drive: Access routes meant for individual properties.
  • Pedestrian Link: Paths connecting different parts of the development for pedestrian use.
  • Cycle Link: Paths designated for cyclist use to connect various areas.


What aspects should be evaluated in relation to this document?

Traffic and Access


Check if the vehicular, pedestrian, and cycle access points are sufficient to handle the expected traffic and ensure safe ingress and egress.

Analyse how the proposed street network (primary, secondary, shared surface, private drives) will impact traffic flow within and around the development. Consider whether the plan will minimise congestion and improve connectivity.

Examine the design of shared surface streets to ensure they enhance safety for all users by reducing vehicle speeds and providing clear pathways for pedestrians and cyclists.

Evaluate the broader effects of increased traffic on existing local roads and neighbourhoods. Address potential congestion and safety issues that may arise.

Assess how the development’s pedestrian and cycle links integrate with existing networks to improve connectivity for the local community.

Sustainability


Consider if the document includes plans for pedestrian and cycle links, encouraging walking and cycling to reduce reliance on cars and lower carbon emissions.

Determine how well the development’s access points and internal network connect with existing public transport services, promoting the use of sustainable transport options.

Infrastructure and Services


Check whether local infrastructure (roads, paths, public transport) can accommodate the additional load generated by the development.

Ensure the proposed internal network provides necessary infrastructure to support the development, including roads, pedestrian pathways, and cycle routes.

Residential Amenity


Evaluate how the design of streets and access points will affect the quality of life for residents, considering factors such as noise, safety, and convenience.

Check the ease with which residents can access amenities, services, and public transport, enhancing overall livability.

Environmental Impact


Review how the construction and use of access routes may affect local green spaces, wildlife habitats, and overall environmental quality.

Assess plans for minimizing environmental disruption and ensuring sustainable development practices.


Disclaimer


Objection to Planning Application 27000-005 — 20240621 – 02.pdf


Traffic and Access Concerns: This section reviews the developer’s documents related to traffic and access. It identifies critical weaknesses in the proposed solutions, such as the increased traffic congestion and potential safety hazards due to narrow roads and lack of street lighting.

Parking and Cycle Strategy Plan: This section discusses the insufficiency of proposed parking spaces and the lack of secure cycle storage, which could lead to on-street parking and associated safety issues, and does not promote sustainable transport options.

Walking, Cycling, and Horse-Riding Assessment: This section highlights deficiencies in existing infrastructure, such as narrow footways and lack of street lighting, posing safety risks for pedestrians and cyclists, especially during low-light conditions.

Legacy Recommendations and Historical Context: This section references historical concerns and recommendations for an EIA due to significant impacts on critical junctions. It underscores the need for comprehensive assessments to understand cumulative traffic impacts.




Disclaimer


Objection to Planning Application 27000-005 — 20240621 – 03.pdf


1. Procedural Concerns:

This section addresses the incomplete disclosure of material considerations and the lack of public awareness regarding the application’s consideration under Paragraph 11 of the NPPF. It emphasises the importance of transparency and informed public participation.

2. Impact on Traffic and Access:

This section discusses the increased traffic congestion and potential delays to emergency services due to the proposed development’s access plan leading to Lymington Bottom Road, a primary route to hospitals and other essential services.

3. Potential Procedural Error:

This section points out the potential procedural errors due to the failure to disclose all material considerations and the omission of a comprehensive EIA, which might undermine the integrity of the planning process.

4. Conclusion:

This section concludes that the proposed development does not meet the sustainability criteria required by Paragraph 11 of the NPPF. It urges the council to reject the application unless substantial revisions are made to address the critical concerns comprehensively.




Disclaimer